why did labour lose the 1951 election

Reply 1 7 years ago A TSR George OP social reform and nationalisation. That was three million less than the number of summonses, warrants and benefit deduction orders issued for poll tax non-payment. They suggested the election should take place the following year, in 1952, hoping the government would be able to make enough progress towards economic improvement to win the election. Little did Provow know at the time, but "Castle Bravo" and the five other tests he witnessed would have a direct effect on his health and the health of his friends he was serving on the . Both of these policies were unpopular amongst the mass electorate, and rationing caused consternation most notably the middle class, to whom the need for wartime prudence was no longer apparent. Extremely cold weather met with insufficient stockpiles of coal, and much industry ground to a halt as a result. Senior Labour MP Margaret Hodge described Baroness Boothroyd as "inspirational" and "a trailblazer for women". 1950 Surplus 297 million fell to Why didn't Labour win the election 1948 Representation of the People Act What was the name of the 1948 law which changed constituency boundaries Liberal Party What party saw their vote fall from 2.6 million to 730,556 Sets with similar terms POLS 315 Exam 3 67 terms Leiigit_Kae American Gov Unit 4 Exam 91 terms Alexis_Martyn45 Understandably, the architect and far left member of the party, Bevan, was enraged at this suggestion. The popularity of the 1942 Beveridge Report, which laid much of the groundwork for the establishment of the NHS and the Welfare State, was an endorsement of Labour politics. History-UK-BK1-Labour-1951 election. But one of the reasons why Churchill lost the general election in 1945 was because he had succeeded in. accepting the ideas of NHS and that so much about economics, This split caused to distinct groups to form within Labour; the Bevanites and the Gaitsgillites. In 1951 labour actually polled more votes than the conservatives and in 1945 Labour only polled 8% more than the Conservatives yet gained a landslide of seats. Labour argued that they had earned their independence by fighting in WW2, and that it was not economically viable to sustain them. Similarly, Labour simply made too many promises that were out of their reach, however they did fulfil most of their promises. In February 1957, Labour won the seat of North Lewisham in what was their first by-election gain from the Tories in almost twenty years. Sterling crisis 1966, devaluation 1967, tax rises, public spending cuts and rejection of the EEC application 1963. Conservative opposition fell off quickly, however, when the popularity of the NHS became increasingly apparent following its inception in 1946. A TSR George 17 I got all the reasons.but looking at the figures conservative had 13.7mil votes and labour got 13.9mil. Why did Labour lose its seats in 1951? Their election campaign was heavily based off the idea that, if voted into power, there would be a period of consolidation after the previous years of innovation. electricity-1948 In fact, Dennis Shanahan wrote in The Australian: Morrison didn't just beat Labor in this election. Pre-war Conservatives were labelled Guilty Men by Labour, this was very influential in winning over public opinion for Labour who presented themselves as the only party able to prevent another war. Homefront experiences had also caused a rise in support for Labour: evacuees educated many people to the realities of poverty in Britain's cities and the Blitz brought people together in communal bomb shelters and broke down social barriers. Rather, the balance of payments problem forced the non-idealists within the leadership to face the necessary curtailing of public spending. The 1951 United Kingdom general election was held twenty months after the 1950 general election, which the Labour Party had won with a slim majority of just five seats. Their living standards had not radically altered since 1945, and the significance of many of these voters is that they voted in marginal constituencies. why did Labour lose the 1951 election? This aim was ill-fated and in the eyes of many economists obviously exceeded the country's economic capacity. The election result was a disaster for Labour. The Conservatives reluctance to accept this report was hugely beneficial to Labour who capitalised on the huge of public support behind it. between people of different administration (up to In 1945 Labour had won 11.99m (47.8%) of the vote, and went on to attain 13.95m (48.8%) of the vote in 51. favoured Just over a year later, with the Labour government in deep crisis about a number of ill-conceived policies, yet another election was called. By 1951, however, their roles had reversed. Bevin's speech 1948 where he referred to The party had achieved many of the reforms put forward in their 1945 manifesto, most noteably the implementation of the welfare state, and now lacked new policy ideas. The split ran deep within the Labour party and consequently it was deeply weakened, so when it came to the 1951 election, Labour found it much harder to fight against the now united Conservatives who had been re-organisation under a new leader. Nevertheless, the war was clearly more important in raising Atlee's reputation among Britons because Attlee was effectively completely in charge of the homefront for the duration of the war. downfall 1950, Balance of Payments record: Act. Manne identifies that the use of the word 'Affair' is a clear indication of how . It was the first election in which Labour gained a majority of seats and the first in which it won a plurality of votes. Also in both cases the campaigns were of negligible importance. leadership remembered in a In contrast to the break-up of the MacDonald Labour government in 1931, there was no 'bankers' ramp' or dramatic and overwhelming financial crisis. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. The 1942 Beveridge Report was the most important report that contributed to Labour's success in 1945. keeping the NHS, Attractive party to businessmen Labour 295 (48.8%) Although this was not much in terms of the popular vote, Labour lost 78 seats and the Conservatives gained 101; Labour were left with a majority of just five seats. For the first time, the government provided a catch-all benefits system which hypothecated a proportion of tax revenue thence to be paid against sickness, elderliness and unemployment to name but three key entitlements. Clement Attlee was leader of the Labour Party from 1935 to 1955, and served as Britain's Prime Minister from 1945 to 1951. Following the 1966 General Election, the Labour Party's Home Policy Committee observed that the party had, "for the first time, obtained a majority of the female vote" and remarked, "it would be very satisfactory if we could retain it." years of the party opposed to the split labour, His limited standing within the House of Labour was re-elected in 1950 but lost 80 seats in the process. Also the Conservatives were much better funded in 1951, by business men afraid of further nationalisation the only major labour reform that the Conservatives dared to take a firm stance against. Labours answer focused on working class interests. Sarah from CollectifbdpHi there, would you like to get such a paper? Labour - 295 seats, Conservatives - 321 seats, Liberals - 6 seats In 1951 the Liberals put up 109 candidates, in 1945 they had put up 475. Essay on why Labour failed to renew itself after it fulfilled its 1945 manifesto By 1951, however, their roles had reversed. In 2011, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey began a billion-dollar project to replace the vertical ropes connecting the cables to the deck, but the deck itself remained in place.. St. John's Bridge (Oregon)opened in 1931.A redecking project was completed in 2005. The popularity of the 1942 Beveridge Report, which laid much of the groundwork for the establishment of the NHS and the Welfare State, was an endorsement of Labour politics. 'consolidation', Division also came as Bevan was resentful in Dunkirk triggered many people to blame the conservatives and their previous leaders for appeasement. Why did Harold Wilson win the 1964 Election. Each party's history had a role in both 1951 and 45, the conservative led National Government of the 1930s were blamed for the depression, appeasement and delayed rearmament in 1945. Although progress was initially slow on this front, one million houses were eventually built and the housing problem was eased for a while. 'Labour Lost the 1979 Uk General Election Due to the Strength of the Conservative Opposition'. The 1946 National Health Service Act provided free access to a range of hospital and general practitioner services across the country. Britains involvement in the Korean War also enabled the Conservatives to play on Churchills war hero status. league at peak had 100,000 But Labour didn't lose in 1983 because it was too left wing; rather, Thatcher won because of the Falklands War. The Conservatives, on the other hand, met the report with lukewarm support, disliking Nationalisation and the Welfare State. Conservatives 290, 1950-51 Labour were in office Ultimately, the Conservatives profited from the decreased presence of Liberal candidates as they were able to win their votes through appealing to middle class needs, more so than Labour, who was affliated with the continuation of rationing, high taxes, wage freezes and unfulfilled promises for housing. This people's war was very beneficial to Labour in warming people to socialist ideologies, and their belief on the war being not just a fight against the fascist Germany, but a struggle for a prosperous post-war Britain was welcomed by the electorate. WW2) needed loans to sustain economy, Keynes 1945 secures Hardly surprisingly. It had several effects, all of which were harmful in both the long and short term. response of Tory MP to Never before had the party achieved an overall majority in the House of Commons, and yet now Labour had a huge parliamentary majority of 146 seats. This rule was ended in 1964 by Harold Wilson's reunited Labour party. he knew so little about The Labour government called a snap election for Thursday 25 October 1951 in the hope of increasing its parliamentary majority. The year 1947 brought an abrupt end to the honeymoon, as the government was forced to shift focus from massive reform to crisis management in response to fuel and trade shortages. Firstly, the Parliamentary party was split in its loyalties to the party leadership, and cohesion within the legislature was less assured. The financial strain of rearming subsequently led Gaitskell, who at this point was Chancellor of the Exchequer, threatening the idea of introducing prescription charges to the NHS (although it was not implemented until the Conservtives gained power in 1951 ). how the radical Labour In 1945 the Conservatives had suffered from being divided and disorganised, while Labour had been strong and united. He set in motion key reforms to wipe out the image of the Conservative party being upper class elitists who do not understand the people that had been so prevalent in the last election. Labour lost the election to the party whose ideas it was preaching. protecting against the This is considered an important factor in Labour's victory by many historians Support for Labour in 1945 represented above all a reaction against pre-war Conservatism argues Adelman. and failed to outline their Voters associated labour with Austerity. Then, in the summer of 1947, problems arose with the US war loan to be paid to the British government, in the form of the convertibility clause. WW2 obviously played a large role in the results of both the 1945 and 1951 elections, in 1945 its effects were clear on the homefront as it had acted as a catalyst to socialist ideas and in 1951 it was the economic turmoil that the war had triggered which led to many people to vote for the reliable conservatives. why did labour lose the 1951 election. system, Alongside the abolishment of Liberals 6, Note how Labour actually achieved a This type of system naturally leads one to question the truth behind calling the Labour victory a landslide. legislation, Commitment to full employment and a mixed economy, Said to focus upon its previous Morisson, the Deputy Prime Minister, believed that The very honesty and simplicity of the campaign helped enormously. The economy's recovery was further hindered by the short-sighted need to remain a world power. Conservatives promised to reduce taxes but keep the NHS. In 1945 the Conservatives had suffered from being divided and disorganised, while Labour had been strong and united. Morrison, was moved to minister of employment, Proposed introduction of The campaign is all too often seen as the most important factor in Labour's landslide victory in 1945, however it is of less importance than the war or their policies, for example. rather than 0% Evidently, the Conservatives were punished in 1945, when they were lucky to not have been in 1935 and, arguably, if elections had taken place in 1940, Labour may have won. Activision's Spycraft: The Great Game is the product of a very specific era of computer gaming, when "multimedia" and "interactive movies" were among the buzzwords of the zeitgeist. positive light, Presented themselves as a united Failure of liberal party leads to more marginal victories for C's. Labours taxation policies unpopular with middle classes led them to lose the 1959 election. The first-past-the-post system ensures that the elected government has a workable majority. With an inadequate sense of self-renewal, the Attlee era party had little further to put before voters after 1947. 5 Labour and Conservative Governments, 1964-79 Why did the Conservatives lose the election of 1964? In realising that the quality of life was far more important to the public than any other factor, the Conservatives promised to build 300,000 houses a year, although they did admit in their manifesto that not much could be done to lessen the strain of rationing in 1951. Most significantly, Labour established the NHS in 1948, they also brought about various other reforms pertaining to welfare. Lord Woolton was also key in the reformation of the party; holding membership dirves, propaganda campaigns and obtaining donations from bug businesses who were threatened by Labours nationalisation.